Staff augmentation vs project outsourcing

Should I use staff augmentation or outsource the whole project?

Staff augmentation puts engineers inside your team, under your management, on your roadmap. Project outsourcing hands a defined scope to a vendor who manages delivery. Choose augmentation when the work is ongoing and the requirements evolve. Choose outsourcing when the scope is fixed and you have nobody to manage engineers.

Side by side

Brazil project outsourcing
Who manages the workYou doThe vendor does
Who owns the roadmapYouShared, renegotiated by change order
PricingMonthly rate per engineerFixed price or time and materials
Best when requirementsChange weeklyAre frozen up front
Knowledge after the engagementStays if the engineer staysLeaves with the vendor unless you plan for handover
Your management overheadReal — you run these peopleLower day to day, higher at contract boundaries

When project outsourcing is the better choice

When Brazil is the better choice

We sell one side of this comparison, so read it with that in mind. The numbers in the table are the ones we would want a buyer to check independently — and the section above it is there because a comparison that never concedes anything is not a comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Can we start with one model and switch?

Moving from a fixed project to augmentation is common and easy. The reverse is harder: once engineers know your system, converting them into an arms-length vendor throws away the thing you paid for.

Other comparisons

Tell us the role. We come back with candidates.

A 20-minute call to scope the role, then vetted profiles within five business days. No fee to talk, no retainer, no exclusivity.

Get candidates See pricing