Contractor vs employer of record for hiring in Brazil

Side by side

When an employer of record is the better choice

• You want the engineer to be legally your employee, with benefits and a long-term relationship.
• Your legal or compliance team has a policy against contractor relationships that look like employment.
• You are building a Brazilian team of five or more and want one payroll rather than five invoices.

When Brazil is the better choice

• You want to start in days rather than weeks, and to be able to stop with 30 days notice.
• You are testing whether nearshore works for your team before committing to a legal structure.
• You would rather one supplier relationship than an employment relationship in a jurisdiction you do not know.

We sell one side of this comparison, so read it with that in mind. The numbers in the table are the ones we would want a buyer to check independently — and the section above it is there because a comparison that never concedes anything is not a comparison.

Frequently asked questions

What is misclassification risk in Brazil, concretely?

Brazilian labour courts look at the substance of the relationship — fixed hours, exclusivity, direct subordination — not at what the contract says. Contracting through a studio puts that relationship between the engineer and the studio rather than between the engineer and you, which is the structural reason companies use this model instead of hiring individuals directly. It reduces your exposure; it does not make it zero, because the same courts can look past the structure at whoever actually directs the work. Any vendor telling you the risk is eliminated is selling you certainty it cannot give. Ask your own counsel; we are not lawyers and we will not pretend otherwise.

Other comparisons